This article presents two methods to determine average (50% probability of failure) constant amplitude (CA) S-N curves.
List of Symbols
|N||Cycles||Life to failure|
|Pü||Probability of survival|
|Rm||MPa||Material ultimate strength|
|Rmax||MPa||Strength of structural item (e.g. static strength of a riveted joint)|
|Sa||MPa||Stress amplitude in cycle|
|Sa,max,N=1||MPa||Allowable maximum stress amplitude in cycle at N=1, i.e. upper asymptote of S-N curve corrected for the mean stress|
|Sm||MPa||Mean stress of cycle|
|Smax||MPa||Maximum stress in cycle|
|Smin||MPa||Minimum stress in cycle|
|c, k||Coefficients in Basquin and Strohmeyer equation|
|C1, C2||MPa||Coefficients in Weibull equation
C1 = Sf
C2 = Smax,N=1
|C3, C4||Coefficients in Weibull equation|
An SN curve is a method to represent fatigue life data.
On the horizontal axis number of cycles to failure N is given on logarithmic scale. On the vertical axis the stress amplitude Sa (or sometimes the maximum stress level Smax) is given, either on logarithmic or linear scale. These stresses are net section stresses.
The S-N curve has two asymptotes, one for which Sa equals the fatigue limit Sf and one for which Smax equals the static strength Rmax of the structural item (in case of SN curves for materials this will be the ultimate strength Rm).
Between the asymptotes, the SN curve is often more or less linear on log-log scale. A schematic representation of an SN curve is shown in figure 1.
S-N curves are given for a specific value of Sm or R (=Smin/Smax).
There exist various mathematical expressions for SN curves. The most commonly used expression is the Basquin equation:
Another well-known expression is the Weibull equation:
In these equations, C1 represents the lower asymptote (fatigue limit) and C2 represents the upper asymptote.
Further, the Strohmeyer equation is often used:
There are different approaches to perform the tests. In this article, the EN 6072  and the JIS Z 2273  test methods are discussed.
This method is described and specified in  and is commonly used. In short, the method implies that at least 10 specimens are tested, all at different constant amplitude stress levels, such that the life (number of cycles to failure) will be in the range of 104 to 3∙106 cycles. It is common practice to use 1 specimen for a static test to estimate the upper asymptote of the curve. This is however not necessary; the upper asymptote can be estimated from the material strength.
In general, this test method is used to generate test data for determination of the coefficients for the Weibull curve. The fitting method is presented in  and can be best described as a least square method applied on both S and N. The statistical method is mostly applied such that it gives all 4 coefficients of the Weibull equation. An alternative to this application is to fix the values for the upper and lower asymptote (determine them on beforehand) and to use the method to determine only to determine the shape coefficients of the curve. There are some reasons why such an alternative is preferred:
– EN 6072 makes no distinction between failures and run-outs. This makes the outcome of the analysis less accurate.
– The actual value of Sf (lower asymptote) determined using  depends on the chosen stress levels, especially if run-outs are used in the analysis.
Using alternatives such as  avoids those problems.
JIS Z 2273
This method is described and specified in . In short (see also figure 2), the method implies that at least 14 specimens are tested. 8 specimens are used to determine the finite life part of the SN curve, all at different constant amplitude stress levels; and 6 specimens are used to determine the fatigue limit using the staircase method .
The coefficients for the finite life part of the SN curve are often determined using the least square method applied on N.
Since the fatigue limit is separately determined, it should give a more accurate estimation than the EN 6072 method.
 EN 6072, Test Methods – Constant Amplitude Testing, 2010.
 JIS Z 2273, General Rules for Fatigue testing of Metals, 1978.
 Gecks, M. & Och, F., Ermittlung dynamischer Festigkeitskennlinien durch nichtlineare Regressionsanalyse, DLR, 1977.
 Staircase Test Method.
The Fatec Academy is for members only. If you are a member, please log in.
Not a member?
You can definitely become one!