In part 1 of this blogpost it was discussed that also for fatigue analysis using local stresses, the gradient of the S-N curve depends on the stress concentration.
But also the stress ratio R=Smin/Smax of a stress cycle affects the gradient. Often S-N curves are given for R=-1. To obtain the S-N curve for a different value of R some corrections are made. The upper asymptote of the S-N curve is determined by the condition that Smax≤Rm. With increasing mean stress level, the upper asymptote will decrease by the mean stress value.
The lower asymptote, i.e. the fatigue limit, will also change with changing R, but to a lesser extend. For R≠-1, the fatigue limit gets a mean stress correction according to Goodman, Gerber or some other method. The correction depends on the R value, but also on the ductility of the material. Since the corrections on upper and lower asymptote are different, S-N curves tend to become flatter with increasing R or mean stress. This applies to S-N curves based on nominal stresses, but also on S-N curves based on local stresses (the difference between both is just the factor Kt).
Many codes and FE fatigue tools use a fixed gradient with k=5 in de equation (Sa^k)*N=c. In reality, the value of exponent depends on the stress concentration, the stress ratio and the material. Using k=5 is too much of a simplification, in practice values of k vary between 3 and 15.
Welded joints can be considered as an exception; using k=3 is acceptable because fatigue of welded joints is independent of mean stress levels and the stres concentrations are that severe that a change in welding detail has very small impact on the gradient.
Do you want to know more about fatigue analysis?
Download our free ebook and subscribe to our newsletter and we will keep you informed about fatigue and Fatec Engineering.